Many readers struggle to embed images into comments for illustrative purposes, so courtesy of Daniel O’ Callaghan, here is a guide to doing so, using the Imgur application.
Imgur offers you different links to your uploaded photo, but only one option works to embed the photo directly in your post. How you find the correct link depends on the device you’re using.
Using an Android tablet:
1. Upload the photo to Imgur.
2. Touch and hold on the image for a couple of seconds.
3. A window will pop up giving you a number of different Share to options.
4. Touch the Copy URL icon.
5. Paste that URL into your post.
There may be a more technical term for Touch and hold on a touch-screen device, but what is meant by this is to place your finger on the image and keep it there until the window pops up.
Using a Windows Laptop:
1. Upload the photo to Imgur.
2. Right-click on the image.
3. A window will pop up giving you a number of different options.
4. Click on Copy image address.
5. Paste that URL into your post.
Using an Apple iOS device:
1. Upload the photo to Imgur.
2. Click on the Share icon below the image.
3. Click on Copy Link.
4. Paste that URL into your post.
A one sentence introduction in bold to set the scene and tempt readers. This can run to two lines but ideally, not much more.
The purpose of this piece is to illustrate to new contributors how a DTW article is laid out on the page and to offer tips on format and house style.
Body text here: An opportunity to outline the main point of the article. This can run on to one paragraph or two before the page break. This break is placed (insert read more tag on dashboard or Shift+Alt+T), no later than the second paragraph – the aim of which is to hide the bulk of the article on the home page until the continue reading link is clicked upon.
The main or lead photo should be the only image to appear before the break. All subsequent images must be placed after the page break.
The remainder of the text should flow as normal but you can use bold for paragraph headings if you deem it necessary. (as above)
Double quotation marks should be retained for use in direct quotations only. For matters of emphasis, we recommend using either single quotes, or italics (possibly both).
Similarly, the use of exclamation marks should be kept to an absolute minimum.
The DTW style is to employ single word spacing. Double spaces should therefore be avoided.
Paragraphs should ideally be kept relatively short in length, since large blocks of text can appear forbidding to some readers, especially if they are reading on their phones – as many nowadays do.
We tend to recommend pieces to be of roughly 500 – 1000 words in length, although there is some wriggle room around those numbers. This, we have found to be the optimum length before some readers lose interest.
You may of course offer longer-form articles, but beyond a certain length, we prefer to serialise them – firstly in deference to people’s attention spans, and secondly, it also stands as additional content.
If you are quoting from other sources, we ask that you fully attribute the quote. Similarly, research sources, if applicable.
We tend to source images from the wider internet, unless we have a suitable photo ourselves. All images must also be attributed to source. Please check with us before adding images to the library, and try to keep the number of new images to a minimum.
Image sizing is important. Large images (1000 pixels or more) are to be avoided, as they take up too much storage space and are not necessary for DTW purposes. Please do not use the Featured Image function, when adding images.
Once uploaded, we recommend that the article is saved as a draft. Please do NOT click on Publish! The editor will then go over it, to ensure that it is suitable and to carry out formatting and picture edits, so that it conforms to our house style recommendations.
If the article has been scheduled, the Save Draft button is replaced on the dashboard interface by Update. If this is the case, the article cannot be published by anyone but the editor, but can be modified by the author. Please notify the editor if changes are made to the piece prior to the publish date.
We will also correct any glaring typos, should they occur. If there is an issue with the text, or the mode of expression, we will raise this prior to publication, so that a resolution can be reached.
Don’t forget to add Tags and place the article into a Category. You can use more than one category, if it is appropriate to do so. Model names can be useful tags. The more precise the better. Same goes for picture captions. Should this prove too difficult, we are happy to carry out this work prior to publication.
This draft has been categorised as “Simon Says” and the tag is 1972 Lancia Beta.
Every article carries its own unique Permalink, which is its URL on the internet. You will find this at the top of the page beneath the caption bar. This can be edited by the author, to include keywords which can assist people finding your piece on a web search. We recommend you do this, adding as many keywords as is deemed useful, as we believe this is the most effective way for web searches to find your piece.
Please DO NOT place text into the Excerpt text bar.
We recommend you have a good look at how existing articles appear on the site. This will give you a flavour of how we go about things. We are not rigid on matters of tone – sometimes we are playful, sometimes satirical, other times, deadly serious. However, the editor’s decision on content is binding.
We are however, always respectful, towards our subject matter, towards our readers and commentators and most of all, to one another.
We also avoid sensationalism, hyperbole and inflammatory language, preferring to offer a more nuanced tone of voice.
Writing your piece in a word-based processor prior to pasting the finished text into the post is preferable, but is at your own discretion. If pasting pre-prepared copy onto the WordPress Editor, ensure you click on Paste As Text (clipboard icon) first.
Some contributors have difficulties with the wordpress back-end and their pieces require a good deal of work at this end, others appear to have no problems at all. Either way, we will be on hand, should there be any issues.
To this end, we also recommend that all contributors use the ‘Classic Editor‘ over the ‘improved’ version, since we find most people have less issues with the earlier version.
Please also read the Site Guidelines before posting articles or comments.
“May You Live In Interesting Times” is an apocryphal Chinese curse popularised by Bobby Kennedy and it would have to be said that, for the motor industry at least, these are indeed Interesting Times. For much of the World, the single, most relevant, life-changing invention of the late 19th Century was personal propelled transport. The freedom granted by the ability to move reasonable distances, affordably and independently, might be summed up crudely by the British politician, Norman Tebbit’s infamous, so-called ‘Get On Your Bike’ speech but, for Western Society, the vehicle for change was generally the motor car. Continue reading “Welcome To Driven To Write”
“Vive La Difference!” Archie Vicar compares some new products in the family sector, the Simca 1307, the Chrysler 150 and the Talbot 1510.
[Note: It has been drawn to our attention that significant parts of this article are factually incorrect.]
From The Motoring Weekly Gazette, October 1976. Photography by Terry Loftholdingswood. Owing to the poor quality of the original images, stock photos have been used.
All of a sudden there are three entirely new cars fresh on the market to rival the Ford Cortina, the Vauxhall Cavalier and the ancient Renault 16. From England comes the Talbot 1510: good day, sir! From France, we say bonjour to the Simca 1307. And we say “howdy” to the Chrysler 150 from the Americans. There would appear to be something for everyone’s taste here, I say.Continue reading “1976 Simca 1307, Chrysler 150 and Talbot 1510 review”
“Even Beta: Lancia’s thrilling new Trevi.” Archie Vicar takes a look at an exciting new sporting luxury saloon from Italy’s respected Lancia marque.
Track & Motoring, July 1981. Photos by Greg Orford. Owing to an overwhelming cyan-blue colour cast affecting the original images, stock photography has been employed.
Without any doubt Lancia’s engineers have been scratching their heads since 1972, trying to think of a way to top the terrific Beta. Despite its front-drive handicap and an engine donated by Fiat, it really is a cracking car, with much to commend it. So how do they Continue reading “1981 Lancia Trevi Review”
“Another Mill From Peugeot.” Archie Vicar takes a closer look at the latest offering from Sochaux- the 505.
The Monthly Car Review February 1979. Original photos by Douglas Land-Windymere. [sic] Due to liquid spillage upon the transparencies, stock photos have been used. Additional images – Parker Pettiswode.
Here are two items about Peugeot’s famous saloon, the much-loved 505. It is viewed as an icon today and has a strong classic following. If you see an older Peugeot on the road today, chances are it’s a 505 in immaculate condition. These two articles show how the motoring press received the car.
The test drive took place (as of going to press) some fifteen weeks ago. Since then I have found myself polishing shoes and trying to think of an opening paragraph. I shared Boxing day luncheon with my nephew who wanted some advice. I spent most of the meal wondering how I would describe the car (the 505) instead of offering sound counsel. With a quiet pipe of Old Latakia and a few pints at the Bishop’s Head pub in Great Malvern (eight weeks ago) I wondered if it would be permitted simply not to Continue reading “1979 Peugeot 505 Review”
“Point Counterpoint.” Archie Vicar muses on the meaning of Peugeot’s exciting new saloon, the 505.
Drivers & Motorists Monthly (February 1979). Photo by Crispin Darling. Owing to the poor quality of the original images, stock photos have been employed.
The keenly contested large car sector is very profitable. 2.46 million large cars were bought in Europe in 1976. Manufacturers pick different weapons with which to capture these customers. Ford uses keen pricing and generous specifications to help the set-square Granada find its customers (300,000 a year!). Vauxhall tries to Continue reading “1979 Peugeot 505 Review 2”
Encore Again! Archie Vicar tests Citroen’s long-wheelbase CX Prestige.
“Driver & Motorist”, July 1976. Photographs by Dick Trevithick. Owing to shutter spring failure, stock photographs have been used.
Despite producing some technically intriguing cars such as the GS, Citroen’s finances are not in the best condition. And despite this, Citroen devoted more of their precious francs to developing the CX yet further, with this long wheel base limousine, the Prestige. At least this proves that Peugeot are not going to interfere too much in Citroen’s engineering activities.
Prancing horse or lame nag? Archie Vicar samples Ferrari’s 4-seater oddity, the 365 GT4 2+2.
From Motor Enthusiast, October 1976. Photos by Edward Blayliss. Owing to the excessive lens flare of Mr. Blayless’ images, stock photography has been used.
It’s quite peculiar to review a car that already exists. As the only motoring writer in Britain who has been permitted to officially test drive Bristol’s new four-seater, the 603, I can reveal Ferrari’s 365 GT4 2+2 is the same car but worse. Far be it for me to criticise the long, hard lunches put in by Mr Ferrari’s assistants but the 365 GT4 is a rather poor show. And Bristol’s car, despite its slightly brash Chrysler lump, trumps the 365 in every major respect.
Let us consider the ash receptacles. Bristol places theirs near the steering wheel while Ferrari throws theirs somewhere down by one’s knees. Both cars are 4-seater GTs. Both cost a king’s ransom but one car will unfailingly Continue reading “1976 Ferrari 365 GT4 2+2 Review”
Archie Vicar tests three sporting saloons: Triumph’s Dolomite, Lancia’s Fulvia and Alfa Romeo’s evergreen Giulia.
From the Driving & Motoring Weekly Guide, 1972. Photos by Nigel de la Warr. Owing to the unfortunate theft of Mr. De la Warr’s Nikons, stock photography has been used.
Small sporting saloons are becoming an important if quite tiny part of the market place. Naturally, the large family car will always remain the most popular choice for the suburban motorist and business-man on the move. But, for the fellow who likes energetic driving and who also needs to Continue reading “Triumph Dolomite Review”
“No mashed Swedes!” Archie Vicar on the Volvo 244 saloon.
Automotorist, September, 1974, pages 23-29. Photos by Ian Cambridgeshire. Owing to the poor quality of the original images, stock photography has been used.
The Swedish like eating tinned rotten fish. It’s an acquired taste, I am told by those with experience in such things. One is advised to open the tin can under water so as to contain the noxious aromas that would otherwise emanate. And one is also advised to drink plenty of schnapps to kill the taste. That’s really the only part of the whole palaver I can really see my way to agreeing with. I mention all of this by way of an introduction to Sweden’s other acquired taste, their Volvos.
Alfa Resurgent! Archie Vicar takes a look at the new executive car from Alfa Romeo, the Alfetta 1.8
For too long Alfas have been a car for the heart, but can they build one for the head too? The answer could now be “si.” For those of us fond of the Italian maker Alfa Romeo, there are clear signs that there really is a resurgence afoot. “The Alfetta is a new chapter in Alfa Romeo’s history,” said Angelo Scoria, chief of Public Relations, in a press release.
“The Alfetta is full of new engineering thinking and will be a more modern car, one built to a high standard too. It will be a future classic, we believe.” So, reasons to be optimistic. For a very long time Alfa has indeed been guilty of making cars that have Continue reading “1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta Review”
Cortina, Maxi and Victor group test. By Archie Vicar.
From “Driving & Leisure” April 1970. Photography by C. Wadsway. Owing to the unexplained disappearance of Mr. C. Wadsway, stock photography has been used.
When Harold MacMillan declared a few years ago that “you have never had it so good,” he wasn’t thinking of motor cars but perhaps he could have been so doing. Mr and Mrs Average now enjoy the comforts of cosy semi-detached homes away from the bustle of the city and all around England´s towns and villages, the large new supercentres and shopping markets that are sprouting up are a clear sign of the advances being made by business and enterprise. The old is being swept away. Continue reading “1970 Ford Cortina Review”
Something old, something new! Archibald Vicar, Dip. Eng. tries the latest sensation from BMC, the Austin “Maxi.”
From “Today’s Driver” February 1969. Photography by Patrick Lamperay. Due to the poor quality of the original source, stock photos have been used.
There it was, an Austin Maxi, Leyland’s latest motor car. And we were in Dublin, Eire, to test it. It was eight o’clock in the morning and photographer, Lamperey, and I were at British Leyland’s small factory in the middle of what was once the Empire’s second city. While I ought to have been taking in the generalities of the Maxi’s technicalities I was more cognisant of my rather delicate physical state, that of a rotten hangover.
Said hangover was largely as a result of my failed attempt to anaesthetise myself during the festival of mal de mer that was the ferry from Holyhead to Dublin. The duty-free Guinness was at least remarkably cheap so the experience was merely disagreeable and not costly. I was also able to Continue reading “1969 Austin Maxi: Road Test”
Archie Vicar continues touring from London to Latvia in Jaguar’s new XJ-6. His mission, to test this important new saloon and to recover his hand-made shoes left behind on a previous jaunt.
From “Private Motor Car Owner” (pages 34-39, page 109, page 116, December, 1968). Photography by Douglas Land-Windermere. Owing to the very poor quality of the original images, stock photography has been used.
Getting into Latvia was a breeze. We presented our passports and sacrificed a few cherished boxes of Craven “A” cigarettes and we were in. Even the sight of the new Jaguar, in De Luxe trim and virtually rust free, didn’t make the unshaven brute at the border blink. It seemed like we would sail through under the dusty hem of the Iron Curtain.
“Uncommon the twain!” In what is probably a purported period review, the motoring writer Mr. A. Vicar considers the choices of car afforded to varietists enjoying a moderately higher-than-average income.
[From “The Motoring and Driving Register”, July 1967. Photography by Cyril Leadbeater. Owing to the poor quality of the original images, stock photos have been used.]
This month’s motor vehicle comparison pits two well-established players against one another. For the gentleman of comfortable means life affords choice and what is choice if it is not among things that differ? What point is there in being offered a large range of very similar cars for a similar price as many makers seem to want to do these days? That is no choice at all. We can see at the more pedestrian end of the market – and indeed have done for some time now- that many car builders are merely shadowing one another so that were one to sit inside a Ford, a Vauxhall, an Austin, or a Hillman selling for, say, £800, one could not Continue reading “1967 Humber Super Snipe Review”
There is no fixed minimum or maximum size for a contribution, but please don’t expect to deliver a series of staccato two-liners in a day and have them all featured – we are not a running comment website.
We would prefer that you publish under your proper name, or at least a variant of it, rather than a screen name, since ‘The History of the Desmodromic Valve’ by BigCheesyThing lacks gravitas. However, if you insist, you may.
We would like contributions to be any combination of interesting, insightful, informative, controversial or amusing. The piece should be original, though attributed quoted references are fine.
Please don’t submit anything that is not your own work – it would reflect quite badly on us, but it would reflect very badly on you. We will do our best to check the provenance of anything submitted but, should you find anything on this site that should not be here, please let us know and, assuming you are correct, we will remove it promptly.
We don’t restrict to cars. We are interested in facts and opinions on the past, present and future. We reserve the right not to publish if we consider something to be gratuitously offensive, incomprehensible or supremely dull. That said, you might read something here that you consider to be any one of those – if so we apologise in advance, but all these things are subjective, and it is our site after all.
We are not insisting that individual posts win literary prizes, though we do want them to read as well as possible, so emoticons and SMS abbreviations are banned from all posts. We lack the inclination to be grammarian pedants, but we do reserve the right to make any small corrections to spelling, grammar or punctuation. If more substantial changes are necessary in order to make something clearer, we will suggest and agree them with a contributor before publishing.
We are tolerant of occasional vulgarity, until it becomes repetitively gratuitous. Your definition of bigotry might not coincide with ours, but ours will be the default in judging and deleting offensive generalisations. In this, our view is final.
Photos can be included. Images should be of good quality and preferably submitted as JPGs in a reasonably compact file size. Normal display sizes on this site are 300 pixels or 640 pixels wide. We try to correctly credit photos we use, but if we inadvertently use something we shouldn’t, (and you’re the owner), let us know and we’ll remove it.
This is an English language website, and there is probably a slight, though certainly not complete, Eurocentric bias, but we have no desire for the scope of this site to be so restricted.
Some articles may be designed to start a discourse and, in these cases, subsequent comments, good or bad, sent in by others will be appended below them. However if you, or we, feel that is not appropriate to a particular subject, we will not offer that facility, although other contributors will still be able to submit a further piece inspired by something they have read. (see Guidelines for Comments below)
In submitting, you grant us the right to maintain your contribution on our site indefinitely, without payment of any fee, but copyright remains with you, should you also wish to publish elsewhere.
All original content (words and pictures) remains sole copyright of the author in question and may not be republished in any format or platform except by their express permission.
Guidelines for Comments
When commenting below the line, our policy is one of civility and respect for other’s opinions.
We are tolerant of you taking a robust line when challenging opinions, but we will not tolerate deliberate rudeness or personal insults to other posters, or to any nationality, race or minority. If you can’t differentiate between these things, this probably isn’t the site for you.
We take a broadly apolitical line at DTW, and would ask that all commenters respect this. There are plenty of other sites where such matters are welcomed.
We have neither the disposition nor the financial clout to defend your desire to libel anyone, so if you consider that, say, someone in the industry is a crook or a con-artist, you’ll have to give us firm evidence before we publish.
We reserve the right to take any action we deem appropriate to ensure this site is not disrupted or abused in any way. Similarly, we will remove all spam material, blatant advertisements and trolling.
DTW is not a revenue-generating site. We fund it from our own pockets and it operates through the enthusiasm of its founder-editors and the written contributions of its guest writers. Therefore, all written contributions are of a voluntary nature and no monetary recompense can be offered.
Driven to Write contains no advertising of any description and is entirely impartial. We do not gather, use or disseminate data about site users.