Theme: Facelifts – Festie’ Refaced

The ‘It should never have worked but by Jingo it did’ facelift: 1983 Ford Fiesta

1979_ford_fiesta-pic-8699712704554326350

The original Ford Fiesta’s sales successes made it so ubiquitous that its appearance ceased to be either noticeable or remarkable. This however belies Tom Tjaarda’s initial design, which was neat, well executed and had, by the tail end of the ’70s, worn well. However as a new decade began, it began to appear dated against newer and sleeker rivals.

wallpapers_ford_fiesta_1983_1

Uwe Bahnsen’s studios had dragged Ford’s styling screaming into the avant garde with the 1982 Sierra, so naturally the 1983 Fiesta facelift aimed to continue this modernist theme. It could so easily have been dreadful, but the graft of a new, slightly longer, lower nose was seamless. At a stroke, the dated appearance of the existing model was excised, giving the seven year old design a further six years of robust sales success before it was replaced by the rather lacklustre and derivative mark 3 model. A car that would require at least three major facelifts over its equally lengthy lifespan aptly demonstrated that executed properly, you only really need to do it once.

fiesta25

Photos via Favcars/Fastfordmag

Author: Eóin Doyle

Founding Editor. [Dis]content Provider.

3 thoughts on “Theme: Facelifts – Festie’ Refaced”

  1. Is the nose really longer or just looks that way because of the more rounded edges and dipping bonnet?

    Also I would argue that in it’s first iteration the MkIII was maybe derivative, but far from lacklustre. I was still driving one only 6 years ago and it still looked (to my eyes at least) fresh and well resolved, and the facelift seem to have been justified solely by the need not so much to refresh it but to keep it in line with the rest of the Ford range.

  2. I’m not entirely convinced about this facelift. First, one could argue that Ford did not want us to view it as a facelift, but as a new model, hence “Mk2” rather than “revised”. Second, because the original Fiesta was quite old by the time the facelift happened, the front section of the car looks smooth and rounded-off, when from the A pillar back, the edges and featurelines, and especially the drip rail/ window surrounds are not and instantly look aged – it’s like a whole new generation car up front, and an old generation car in the middle and back. A similar outcome was delivered in turning the Austin Metro (except it had no marque badging on it by the end of its life) into the Rover Metro, and for similar reasons – the donor car was too old for an effective facelift. All of that said, the “Mk2” XR2 pictured, does look good front-on. The first facelift of the Mk3 was not very cohesive, but the car underneath had been transformed into something that drove very nicely indeed – in fact, arguably it marked Ford’s renaissance as a maker of fun-to-drive cars.

  3. I am with the doubters. The car wasn´t really changed aft of the a-pillar. The roof and especially the guttered doors look angular compared to the smoothed off nose. I rather think the whole reskin of the later models was better and the rear lamps seemed to me to be quite good (I noticed them, for a start).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s