1968 Saab 99: Review

“The new Saab 99 tested”. In this transcript Archie Vicar samples what is now viewed as one of the top-ten great Saabs. Is it more than the anti-Volvo? 

1968_Saab_99_006_4822

From “Mass Motorist” Dec. 1968. Photos by Douglas Land-Windermere. Owing to the poor quality of the original images, stock photography has been used.

Introduction

When people think of Sweden and Swedish cars, they often think of Volvo who make sturdy machines capable of withstanding the horrors of the Scandinavian climate. But it’s worth remembering that Sweden has a second car maker, Saab, who also make fighter jets. Like our friends at Bristol, Saab use the experience they have gained in aerospace to inform the design of their cars.

This rare combination of aerospace expertise and the tradition of Swedish quality means that Saab is in the very fortunate position of having some great strengths to play to when fighting in the export market. It also means their cars are expensive and strange. In these increasingly competitive times, such advantages are of no small significance.

1968 Saab 99 interior
1968 Saab 99 interior

“…mundane world of Austins…”

It was thus with a sizeable sense of anticipation that we packed our suitcases and travelled north to Sweden to examine the new 99, which for this journalist is a far call from the mundane world of Austins, Hillmans, Triumphs and Wolseleys that constitutes our routine work. Most of the drivers of such cars don’t even know that Sweden makes cars, much less know that of the two makers, one is an exciting, lively and original firm and the other is Volvo.

“….exciting but rust prone…”

I always say that a good motor car is the product of the conditions from which it has risen. Italian cars are designed for fiery people who live in a dry climate so their cars are exciting but rust-prone. German cars are designed for a serious but romantic people meaning they drive machines that balance practicality with humorous over-engineering. The Irish like to drink and sing songs so they don’t make cars at all. The same goes for the Welsh. For the life of me I can’t determine how the awful weather and dreary mode of life of the Swedes can give rise to such a thing as a Saab. But then again, the Swedes aren’t noted warriors so why do they make a warplane? I shall ask an academic about this one day

1968 Saab 99 small

“…in September…”

The 99 was first shown in 1967 but it is only now in September we have had a chance to find out how startling the car is. First, the bodywork. The little 99 has been given a striking and wholly rational appearance. It gives the flavour of an aeroplane on four wheels. For anyone used to the upright shapes from Morris, Humber and even MG, this will be a refreshing alternative.

The windscreen is wrapped around, reminiscent of that other aerodynamic but annoying car, the Citroen DS. Sitting in the 99 one feels very much as if the view out is unimpeded and this car surely presages better and better forward visibility if other manufacturers take note, as they surely will. The lines of the car are neat and there is little exterior decoration. The bodywork shows some subtlety of sculpting that the men at Volvo could only dream of. A nicely shaped clam-shell bonnet opens forward and serves to avoid creating the kinds of rust traps which bedevil the cars from other makers (especially Vauxhall who seem to specialise in this area). A jaunty little vent adorns the otherwise spare flanks of the car, sitting just under the rear pillar. It looks like an aerodynamic car and indeed it is, according to scientific measurements of this by the company itself.

“…chances of injury…”

Inside the car, nothing has been left to convention other than the roundness of the steering wheel. The ignition key is located between the front seats so as to reduce the chances of injury. A small light illuminates the ignition itself, which is a remarkable idea. The seats are of a quite novel design (they recline and have extra height to allow the driver to rest his head) and the ventilation system is cunningly conceived and very effective. It is also quite simple.

Again, it brings to mind the kind of cleverness deployed at Citroen but built to a standard unimaginable in Neuilly. A spacious rear seat, trimmed in hard-wearing material, leaves space for three. The luggage compartment was commodious and we were able to force Land-Windermere inside to prove the point. None of his photos came out as it was too dark.

 1968 Saab99Rod_00 small 2

“…regrettable arrangement…”

Under the bonnet we find Saab has swapped their lawn-mower two-stroke for an in-line four banger on the classic Otto cycle. The four strokes refer to intake, compression, combustion (power), and exhaust strokes that usually occur during two crankshaft rotations per working cycle. It appears to be essentially half a V8. This is mated to a four-speed gearbox. [See page 14-19 on the details of MG’s new gear teeth profiles – Ed.]

Since Saab is the opposite of Volvo, the power goes to the front wheels. This otherwise regrettable arrangement suits the snowy conditions that prevail in Sweden. When it is not snowy, the Swedes are, of course, not driving but writhing together in various states of undress in the few brief moments that constitute their short summer. The car runs on a 12 volt system. A diagonal split braking system (with disc brakes) is another sign of Saab’s innovative approach to safety. The fuel tank holds a reasonable 10 gallons or so, enough for a touring range of about 300 miles.

Library photo
Library photo

To drive, the Saab is a light and adaptable machine. At speed, the steering lightens somewhat and it yields much information to the driver. Being so aerodynamic and so light, the car makes good use of the engine’s modest horsepower. The Saab 99 shows tremendous potential for development and is very different in flavour to offerings from Lancia, Alfa and Citroen, those other cars for men with exotic tastes.

The general engineering set-up of disc brakes and front-wheel drive in a monococque chassis has been honed to good effect. The empty roads around Trollhattan afford numerous opportunities to assess the modest understeer, excellent grip and high level of comfort afforded by the 99. It should be noted that it took a fair amount of provocation to unbalance the car meaning that the performance can be enjoyed up to speeds well above the norm prevalent in England.

1968 Saab 99: welcoming but spartan
1968 Saab 99: welcoming but spartan

Summarising conclusion

 That the 99 is comfortable, well-made, satisfying to drive and well-equipped ought to mean that other makers should pay careful attention. Triumph of Coventry and Alfa Romeo of Milan also offer small and rapid saloons. I would contend here that Saab has the advantage of them, and should Saab choose to fit an even more powerful motor, the 99 could be a class leader in a short space of time. This is a car that could upset the applecart in a most profound way.

Deliveries to the United Kingdom begin next year. Rubberised floor-mats will be available in 1972.

Author: richard herriott

I like anchovies. I dislike post-war town planning.

13 thoughts on “1968 Saab 99: Review”

  1. Good fun this, thanks. To respond with a more serious point, reading this, and catching sight of one of the last of the line 9-5s recently, has made me realise that I miss SAAB … quite a lot. I even had strange, financially and practically near-suicidal thoughts of one of those 9-5s being a potential replacement for the C6 (am I the only one amongst us who restlessly plays the deeply unsatisfying, self-torture mind game of “what would I buy next?”). Obviously, the marque became an unsustainable commercial disaster (what “mass producer” can survive on only 2 lowish volume, nichey models?), but surely someone could have made a decent fist of managing it within their portfolio, even if GM couldn’t? VAG comes to mind (are they still known by that TLA?), or, here’s a curved ball, PSA (instead of trying to create a new “semi-premium” brand out of – errrm – DS)?

  2. SJ. You’re certainly not alone, and I’ll trump you for fickleness. After you managed to turn me against the Cactus, I started looking at a Twingo. However, having seen Eoin’s news about the XJ’s declining sales today I suddenly thought ‘I wonder if they are becoming the bargains for the self-employed gent with pretensions on a budget that big Jags have always been?’. Next wee I’ll start looking at Hummer prices.

    There is something very satisfying about the Saab’s appearance. It seems as though the designers have taken a lot of care looking at what you need, and no time at all looking over their shoulder at what Detroit, or others were offering that year.

  3. As a potential buyer of a c6 .. if I had the cohoneys and didn’t specialise in saab spares so have to fly my flag … I can see that we purchasers of niche models are a unique breed with much in common
    stevelewissaab

    1. Hello. So, there are interesting parallels with your line of business and C6 ownership, which will be obvious to you – namely spares. There are already issues obtaining parts for the car, and even small items seem to have to be ordered by PSA from their supply base as limited runs/ or one offs. I guess this is the problem with a car that had such a low production run. So, on that point, and if you don’t mind, just how hard would it be to maintain/ run one of those last of the line 9-5s? The more I have thought about it (and having seen 2 on the road since writing my post on this subject), the more it appeals (and I realise that not every SAAB-anatic likes them, so I’m not expecting any enthusiasm for my way of thinking :-))

      As to C6 ownership, I entered it eyes-wide and actually, nearly 4 years down the line, it’s not as hairy as I feared (things did not start well when the suspension height control failed when I got the car home for the first time!). I’ve had quite high maintenance costs, and the odd part (suspension) fail sooner than I would expect from other cars I have owned (my last car was a Subaru Legacy – so I was spoilt). Obviously, they are all getting on a bit now, but £6k will get a decent early example and the most expensive is around £10k (or £11.5k for a super-rare, very late model 3.0 HDI, of which I believe there are less than 20 in the UK). Although it’s not as out-there as previous big-Cits, it is still an alternative driving and ownership experience in a very conservative class. I enjoy it, for all its (many) imperfections.

    2. Hi (again) I have just looked at your website – given the phone number, you must live in my area … small world! I hope your excellent looking enterprise keeps you and yours in health and comfort.

    3. The last of the 9 5’s is probably going to be worse than the Citroen ultimately. Whilst the mechanicals will be good to go – a la Insignia Vauxhall – but the specific SAAB stuff I suspect is
      1. not reliable because they were working on very tight budgets
      2. Very difficult to get hold of and will be expensive.

      Personally I think the c6 is more interesting. I understand the engine shared with Jaguar and Land Rover is an issue with them. However It looks spectacular and the interior is DS esque. Most of my customers like Citroens as well, they just haven’t wrenched themselves from their trust old shoe SAAB to “have a go”
      I source and re-manufacture (through suppliers) many components for the older SAAB relying on my initiative for when I find I have an issue. If I have an issue – someone else will and approx 60% of my business is export. Sent 2 packages to California this morning.

  4. I have to agree the C6 is more interesting but I´d have a hard time living with the disappointing package. For such a huge car the interior is oddly cramped and the boot is too small. The CX and XM were both elegant and supremely practical. Sometimes relying on good looks means laziness in design. I do however respect those who opt for the C6 as it is a completely viable proposition for 95% of what most cars are asked to do. I do however like a car that goes the extra mile and the Saab seems like it´s comfortable, durable and roomy. I have even grown to accept the odd styling flaw.

  5. Back on track of your very good website. This 99 review is excellent, the writing is a breath of fresh air from the usual PR inspired and sales motivated writing I have come to expect from more recent publications.
    I was particularly taken with the prophetic views on seat belts in the Volvo article and the “couldn’t be more wrong” view reference the Golf article. The whole website makes fascinating reading and I’ll be reading some more. In fact I’d go as far as saying I’d subscribe with a fee
    stevelewissaab

  6. We are glad you like the content. That’s gratifying. The best response is just to spread the word to anyone else you think might be interested. I think there’s a bit of a gap in the variety of automotive websites which this fills. We’re not a single-marque site and we don’t focus on news. Car magazine used to do essay-style writing and now they don’t so we are having to create it ourselves!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s