A Nubar Brougham

Of late DTW has taken a liking to the term ‘brougham’ with our interpretation of it deriving from its use in the post-War US motor industry.

image : bonhams.com
image : bonhams.com

A true, horse-drawn brougham from the 19th Century was an upright carriage, reasonably compact and nimble, with enclosed and comfortable seating for two in the rear, facing forward, leaving a view ahead through glass of the driver and footman exposed to the elements on a raised front seat. In the earlier days of motoring, the transition was quite faithful but, as with other terms from the coachbuilding industry, such as landau, coupe de ville and cabriolet, it began being used more for its classy sound than for its strict adherence to a traditional template.


But, long after Cadillac and others had hijacked the term to suggest added luxury, rather than a specific body style, someone was remaining faithful to the term. Nubar Gulbenkian was well-known in the 50s and 60s for his lavish lifestyle and provocative attitude. A multi-millionaire, both through inherited wealth and his own oil-industry dealings, he was a well-tailored bon-viveur, his own pragmatic interpretation of the English gentleman.

His exploits were fodder for magazines and newspapers and, a bit like Jeremy Clarkson, the public seems to have been inexplicably fond of him, even though he was doubtless entirely indifferent to them. We seemed fascinated by his profligacy and his nonchalantly witty comments on it.

Gulbenkian TaxiHe had various cars specially made but, in particular, he had two Austin FX4 London taxis re-bodied for him in true brougham style, upright at the back with gold plated carriage lamps and an open chauffeur’s compartment. They were built by FLM Panelcraft in Battersea, and at least one had wickerwork covered side panels. Gulbenkian is supposed to have said two things about these conversions. First, that ‘it will turn on a sixpence – whatever that is’ and second to the effect that he liked his driver to be exposed to the elements since he never felt totally dry unless he could see someone who was totally wet.

I’m not asking DTW to amend its current use of the ‘brougham’ tag but, in a world of diminishing rooflines, let us give a short thought to the dearth of vehicles today that the late Mr Gulbenkian could have entered without having to remove his top hat.

7 thoughts on “A Nubar Brougham”

  1. That is a long way from a fully loaded 1978 Olds 88 Brougham.
    Rich people do have odd ideas as we all do but they have the money to execute them. Unlike designers they seldom have critical skills and don’t need to guess as what others might like.

  2. Almost all of the automotive bodywork definitions derive from the horse (and occasionally people) drawn era; Sedan, Wagon, Van, Berlin(a), Spider, Coupé, Cabriolet etc.

    All rather more mundane than a Brougham or Landaulette. Me, I’m waiting for a Stanhope…

  3. A stock FX4 is oddball enough as it is! Purpose-built taxis just plain should not exist, taxi operators prefer used cars in any circumstances where (over)regulation forces them to buy new.

    1. There are purpose built taxis in the UK. Disabled people love them as do their customers. I doubt you can assert that such things “should plain not exist”. They aren’t against the laws of physics. And they only cost about 40k and are amortised long before they wear out.

    2. Yes nlpnt, but what taxi operators prefer and what their customers prefer are two different things. There’s something pleasantly old-fashioned about getting into the back of a black FX or TX, so I agree with Richard. It must be said that their engineering is archaic and, objectively, as vehicles they are mediocre. But still far preferable to the back seat of a worn out Accord.

    1. Laurent. I’d forgotten about the Parisienne (also available in McDupont tartan). It does look nice. It came out in late 1963, so I assume it was inspired by the Peter Sellers Mini – or maybe Mr Gulbenkian’s exploits were also followed in the pages of Paris Match.

      Like the Mini, the 4 also has a diagonal seam ahead of the front door, so I’m surprised they didn’t feature this by cutting the pattern to that point. In my hypothetical car collection, I’m now not sure that I wouldn’t prefer an early 4 to a 2CV, but in plain light blue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s