Like Brabo, Take the Hand of Druon Antigoon

Up until these monsters remained a minority interest, I didn’t really mind them. And they came in vibrant colours too.

1995 Toyota Landcruiser 3-door

The two-tone paint humanises what you could call, after all, a gas-guzzling leviathan. It’s the kind of thing which ought not to be let out of fields or to leave private green lanes. But it’s hard to dislike this car, isn’t it? I always felt that Toyota Landcruisers were for people serious about off-roading – it’s these UN use and not LR’s dodgy toys.

Here this one stands, shiny and clean and entirely unmarked, on my street. I am happy to

1995 Toyota Landcruiser interior

see it though as I had forgotten about these three-door Land Cruisers (J80s, for car-code nerds).


The interior looks as unremarkable as any Toyota Corolla and remains pretty much museum quality. Toyota have not compromised one bit on this interior: bland and characterless as every other Toyota from the period and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. It’s utterly serious. In a way it means you really have to want one of these cars for what it does and not what it looks like inside. This isn’t about signalling anything other than a need to plug mud and haul things.

Consider now how such cars now vie with mid-and high-range luxury saloons for customers:

Leather, alloy details, trinkets and soft carpets. These cannot be avoided in most SUVs because they are not supposed to be used as SUVs whereas Toyota figured this generation of Land Cruiser probably was going to lead a busy life (except this one).

The tide flowed another way after J80, the world shifted on its axis and tectonic plates shuffled in the late 90s and the Land Rover and Land Cruiser did for SUVs what Alfa’s Giulia and BMW’s 2002 did for saloon cars in the 60s and 70s. They opened people’s minds to the idea that a vehicle format can be extended and pushed. In the 1960s a sports car had two doors and a boring old saloon had four. If you wanted status you bought a sports car (or a lazy luxury barge).

The 2002 dragged status and prestige (signified by sportiness) into the saloon format. By analogy, the Land Rover and this car, a surrogate, brought desirability into the SUV format. Interestingly, while the appeal and prestige of the sport saloon was notable, it did not make all other cars into saloons. The desirability of the SUV format in contrast has meant the increasing domination of that format, edging out other formats (c.f. nice coupe**, MPV, small saloon, estate cars).

I don’t mind one or two of these SUVs here and there. This Land Cruiser has a jolly paint job and now has classic status. Today its successors from all marques loom much bigger, 100% likely to be light-blotting slabs of dark paint and 99% unlikely to ever do anything a 1.6 litre five door hatchback couldn’t.

**though to be fair, BMW still make a decent coupe and it has a rear centre armrest. Are coupes dead in the US too?

Author: richard herriott

I like anchovies. I dislike post-war town planning.

6 thoughts on “Like Brabo, Take the Hand of Druon Antigoon”

  1. Agree totally on the general drift.
    But the 2002 trajectory was, at first, the other way, as it came from the four-door 2000 (and 1800).. I had several 02s, but although well-designed they weren’t especially well made — BMC cars I had around then had harder metal in the block, but both bodies had a propensity to rust, especially on big, expensive panels. Maybe the “luxury” part meant being able to afford to replace a 2002 bonnet.

    I can’t remember any other 2+2s of the period to compare the 02 to. MB’s CE was bigger.

    1. Sorry, but I should have written “to compare the 02 wirh. I don’t mind ending a sentence with a preposition, but should be a comfortable one.

      On the Tonka Toys, I can’t see a RAV4 without imagining a giant child’s thumb on its roof about to propel it across the living room carpet.

  2. Hi Richard
    That one is not a proper Landcruiser,it is what is called a Landcruiser Prado 90 series,which is lot smaller and lighter than a real Landcruiser which around the same time would have been an 80 series.
    Regards
    Mike

    1. Ah..! I wasn’t clear on the distinction. It’s not a J-car, then?
      I’ve Googled around and it’s not clear. In my defense it does say “Land Cruiser” on the boot.
      Further research is needed – I have to set the record straight for DTW’s sake.

    2. It is a LandCruiser. I had another look at the car which resides on my street or near to and it says in clear, large letters “Land Cruiser” with no qualification. It might not be the biggest or butchest ´cruiser but it one.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.