AUTOpsy: Mercedes-Benz SL (R231)

It it takes a lot to get one of the most revered models in automotive history to the brink of extinction. Yet this generation of Mercedes SL’s got what it takes. 

fullsizeoutput_10a4

Despite having possessed neither eponymous quality in ages, the Mercedes Sportlich-Leicht has been a car for the ages, and, on certain occasions, even age-defining.

The original 300SL was one of the first motor cars ever to be described as a ‘classic’ and remains exactly that. Its Pagoda (W113) progenitor still ranks among the most elegant vehicles of all time and established the concept of the European open top boulevardier. The indefatigable R107 SL acted as proof of life of the sophisticated European convertible from 1971 to 1989 and became a fashion statement almost a decade after its launch. The SL to eventually succeed it, dubbed R129, turned out to be both an icon of and a swan song to the highest German product design values.

23 years later, the SL is still with us, but has lost any sense of relevance. The former benchmark has become an obscurity, which cannot be explained simply by changing customers’ tastes.

Of course, this R231 was preceded by another SL, the Steve Mattin-penned R230. Unquestionably a statement car upon its unveiling in 2001, hindsight and a facelift of such cack-handed quality that it appears to have been outsourced to Fiat’s Centro Stile have seen to its stature deflating over the past decade-and-a-half.

Given these circumstances, it could be argued that R231 was either up against the odds from the get-go or had the chance of marking a true return to form for a slightly dulled badge upon its introduction in 2012.

fullsizeoutput_109c

Not up to interpretation is R231’s perception by the media and prospective customers though, which was hardly enthusiastic initially and hasn’t improved since. In an imploding sector of the market that it now truly owns, this SL hasn’t managed to leave any mark at all.

Most if this is to do with its styling. The market may admittedly have fallen out of love with the folding hard top convertible in general, but this feature is the least of R231’s issues. For the list of R231’s aesthetic shortcomings is almost as long as the SL model’s history.

First of all, R231 perplexes, courtesy of its awkward stance. In contrast to both its immediate predecessors, this SL suffers from an obviously excessive front overhang to which unnecessary additional visual weight is added by the bluff silhouette of the front. In addition, even high-spec examples appear somewhat under-wheeled.

fullsizeoutput_10a3

With its body thus overwhelming the chassis, R231 comes across like a pretend performance car à la Alfa Montreal, despite the fact that it shares many components with the thoroughbred SLS sports car.

The ineptitude of this SL’s stance happens to go hand in hand with the sides of R231’s body appearing to be at their widest towards the top, exacerbating the issue of the car’s poorly judged stature.

These fundamental issues aren’t helped by the coarse details that beset R231’s body.

Aiming for a cleaner appearance than its unashamedly ornate immediate predecessor, R231 ends up combining the worst of both worlds: lack of sophistication with ungainly, attention-seeking flourishes.

Unlike the, at first glance, simple, but rich surfaces of the VH/HA Mercedes models designed under Bruno Sacco, R231’s appearance suggests a hasty styling process that didn’t involve an excessive amount of work on full-scale clay models. For here, what appears to be simple truly is simple, as in: lacking in sophistication. None of the creases and swage lines on the bodywork impress through the virtue of being expertly crafted. Yet they are not even superficially striking either, despite the grille’s surrounding and the arrangement around the fake side vents suggesting some intended ‘showy’ effect.

Of course, R231’s trademark detail must be its headlight design, whose most prominent feature is the Fackel (torch) indicator, which has since become a mainstay trait of Gorden Wagener’s Sensual Purity® mantra. R231 incorporates it in a way that just about works from certain angles, but doesn’t do so at all from most others. The idea to align the behind-the-glass graphics with those of the grille outline, while simultaneously having the light unit’s basic shape seemingly clash with the grille, may have seemed like a clever idea in certain drawings, but doesn’t work in three dimensions.

What this major mistake achieves though is to distract from the front lamp unit’s confused graphics, which fail to coalesce into a coherent whole.

Speaking of lamps, it must be said that their design at R231’s rear doesn’t fare an awful lot better. Seemingly influenced by the BMW E60 (front light) design, they suffer from a confused basic silhouette that’s trying to integrate the different creases and a weak swage line into a coherent whole. Which would be decent enough an approach, if there wasn’t that slight indent flanking the boot aperture. Its soft form suggests a striving for elegance that is utterly at odds with this SL’s overall design and turns a dull rear end into an irritating one.

To add insult to injury, the lamps’ graphics are plain poor. There’s a half-hearted attempt at harking back to the ribbed Mercedes tail light design of yore, but it’s as carelessly executed as the graphics, with LEDs dotted about in careless fashion. No amount of Mercedes-Benz badges can therefore distract from their cheap appearance.

Speaking of Mercedes trademarks, it must be mentioned that in recent years, the most consistently applied trope have been the ovoid door handles that are also present on R231. Since their introduction with the W220 S-class in 1999, they have turned out to be the staple of Mercedes-Benz design, rather than proud three-pointed stars, corrugated rear lights or even torches. In R231’s case, their application appears to be particularly poor, as their ovoid outlined is at odds with the straight crease that’s supposed to ‘run through’ them.

On top of all these shortcomings, R231 also speaks of the general change of attitude that had taken place even before this car’s design process (which started about a decade ago). For R231 is full of fakery, pretend this and faux that.

Of course, neither fake exhaust tips, nor fake mesh are the sole domain of Mercedes-Benz. But that this formerly proud, most-engineering led of companies would not just bow to trends, but apply these tropes in the sloppiest, most offending fashion possible is rather telling. The designers in charge of this car (reportedly Frank Pfisterer and future Nu-A-class stylist, Mark Fetherston) apparently thought little of the cognitive abilities of prospective customers if they thought such conspicuous Mummenschanz would do just nicely.

In that sense, R231 incidentally serves as an excellent homage to Peter Pfeifer’s reign in charge of Mercedes-Benz’ stylistic fortunes.

Without his less than assured hand, Mercedes-Benz, and the world simply wouldn’t be ready for the kind of Sensual Purity® Untertürkheim now indulges in.

The author of this piece runs an obscure motoring site of his own, which you may or may not choose to visit at www.auto-didakt.com

Author: Christopher Butt

Auto-Didakt

9 thoughts on “AUTOpsy: Mercedes-Benz SL (R231)”

  1. What an excellent deconstruction of all that is dysfunctional about this SL. You’ve articulated quite precisely all that makes it uncomfortable to look at for any period of time. This car is a design omnishambles that would shame a third rate manufacturer; the fact that it originates from what is supposed to be one of the most prestigious and upmarket quality marques in the world is truly shocking. I am only surprised that a similar kind of critique has not appeared in the mainstream motoring press. All credit to you, Kris.

  2. Quite so. An awful car.

    The AMG GT surely has usurped the SL at the top end of the market. It is at least better-looking, although faintly ridiculous in its own way.

  3. This was perfectly timed, as i just spent some time staring at the horrible side profile of a parked SL.
    It’s not even Multipla style fun/charming ugly! – who would buy something like that?

  4. An excellent and much-needed critique. How this car achieved sign-off beggars belief and leaves one pondering what horrors were rejected in its stead. This car is W210-wrong, which makes it so much more than inexpertly executed, but in fact, inept.

    Note in the rear three-quarter image (third from top) how the entire front quarter of the car’s flanks appear to be collapsing inwards under the sheer visual weight of the upper body and canopy. That’s not even competent. No, I’m afraid that not even a full and thorough re-skin could save this hulking brute.

    I have read that a new SL is on the cards, but the word on the street is that it will be repurposed as a more dynamic (what else?) vehicle. But with the cartoonish AMG GT fulfilling much of this remit, and the drophead S-Class catering to the more plutocratic end of the spectrum, one wonders why they’d even bother.

    The most likely answer (I suspect) is that to axe the model would entail an embarrassing loss of face for Dr. Zee and all who sail in him and also to demonstrate to its rivals that the mighty Sindelfingen death star can justify a pointless loss-leader, even in the current climate.

  5. Everything after the R129 is an abomination, and I concur in the notion that the SL has completely lost its relevance. What happened was that spot in the market moved up a couple of notches, and Daimler Benz simply lost track of it.

    The Mercedes-McLaren SLR was the new W198, and the AMG SLS/GT is the new Pagoda. Any iteration after the R129 is superflous and should’ve been axed and replaced by the above “real” SL.

  6. An interesting derivative question is, I believe, wether there are any modern ‘Ingenieursautos’ in the mould of the Lancias of the 50’s and 60’s and the older Mercedes.
    I believe the answer is no, and I wonder sometimes what a modern car designed with a rigorous, honest approach to engineering and design would be

    1. We may have asked that question here already. Does such a car have to be analogue?
      What would Vincenzo Lancia do today? I have my own ideas and think a car designed and engineered around such ideals would stand apart (in a good way).

  7. Before reading this article, I thought this generation was just the n’th facelift of the R230.

    How hard can it be to give a two seater car of this lenght and with this pricetag an attractive profile and stance? The CLA suffers the same diseases (long overhangs, big lights with uncohesive graphics, …), but having to make a practical car is a mitigating factor. A very poor effort from das Haus indeed.

    The R230 is a beauty queen next to its successor.

  8. This is a car I´d walk past without looking at. I can´t say it´s much worse than ordinary but for a car in this class that is a cardinal sin. If we are to eschew ostentation, then the alternative is a kind of know-it-when-I-see-it seriousess that is probably rather hard to dial up on demand. The kind of designer who can do this is is not all that common. What´s a studio manager to do about a problem like this? Perhaps the first thing is to recognise the existence of deadly serious design by a look back at the archive. Wagener didn´t think to do this or if he did he didn´t absorb the message. What would I do? I´d send my designers on a month´s course to explore pure form and experiment with nuance. Then they should bring that experience back and see what kind of drawings emerge.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.