Gaze Upon A Cold Moon, Close Enough To Touch

From time to time, DTW fulfills its duty as the automotive website of record. That means occasionally running an item that, on the face of it, may not set so many pulses racing.

Where is the devil?

However, I would like to nonetheless make a small effort draw your attention to a car which is important because of and despite its ubiquity.  It is relatively easy to write about the extreme and the intense. As a result the vast middle ground where life is lived is neglected. I actually once tried to keep a diary of ordinary experiences (I had more time on my hands in 2009) and noted the problem of seeming to lionise the mundane, merely by noting it.

The same applies here to some extent: I don’t wish to present this car as any kind of sine qua non (see this for one of those) just by “curating” it.  That said, you’d be overlooking something if you did not take this opportunity to read on.

“Motoring journalists fear the average car. We love writing about great cars, pulling out our superlatives. And, secretly, we like writing about bad cars as well, because we can be as rude as possible. The problem cars are the ones that fall in between the extremes, because there are only so many synonyms for the acceptable…..”, so said Car in April 2002 when writing about this vehicle, so I am not alone.


Opel launched this iteration of their fleet and family favourite at Geneva in 2002, so we are falling back 17 years into the past, quite some trip, midway into the first term of Bush Jr, the same year as Heathen, I note. The Mk2 Mondeo had been on sale for two years; the Passat had just been facelifted to make it a B5.5 according to some nomenclatures; Skoda’s Superb appeared too;  Renault’s Laguna II had been a year on sale; finally Toyota’s Mk1 Avensis neared the end of its first incarnation.

So, all in all, a market full of quite fresh cars and almost all of them competitive. I have no figures to prove this yet I am quite confident the Avensis sold strongly to the end of its run.

Note, this is also the year of the BMW E65 7er, with its decidedly unusual boot-lid and controversial and soon-revised headlamps.

Sir, SRi!

It was into this market Opel chief Martin Smith had to send a competitor, riding on the Epsilon platform (shared with the smaller-looking 2003 Saab 9-3). In so doing it gained stature its predecessor lacked (good and all as it was) and to my eyes drew on both the neat, industrial design ethos of the Rekord E and the experimental Art & Science theme being developed by Simon Cox (think of the 2000 Imaj).

So 2002

Opel’s press pack for the launch chose words like “taut, distinctive, elegant and understated”. Car (ibid) chose to call it average, inoffensive and plain in their 2002 review. I have a theory that if you told people the 1983 Margaux was just a bottle of red from the super-market they would not notice the quality. Similarly, I think the fact this car wore an Opel badge meant the goodness of the design went far under the radar.

Flash of brilliance

The “car with a premium heart” (from another Car article) manages to retain a lot of dignity almost two decades on. This one is a series 2 with the revised headlamps – the first versions came to the same conclusion as the Ford Fusion and for the same good reason. Either version is visually consistent. For my money the saloon is slightly better than this hatchback. The saloon C-pillar just avoids a Hofmeisteresque kink on the forward edge and widens towards the boot and it clearly has a boot. It’s formal while the hatchback (appropriately?) has sportier emanations.

I find myself looking at this car (and especially the four-door) admiring its cool, technicalesque design which meets all the expectations for seriousness that Audi at one point raised. As a driver’s car it did the business too while also being relaxing at 160 kmph between Jena and Kassel: “The steering initially feels good. Reactions are keen and proportional; turn-in is surprisingly eager. And speed-sensitive power assistance means that the faster you go the firmer it gets….”

That part is less interesting than the effort so obviously expended to strike a balance between appealing to many and still retaining enough character to stand apart from its predecessor and its many and talented peers.

Author: richard herriott

I like anchovies. I dislike post-war town planning.

25 thoughts on “Gaze Upon A Cold Moon, Close Enough To Touch”

  1. Bob Lutz once said that this car didn’t instantly open purses and he was right.
    The looks might be clean but they are an epitome of inelegance.
    The oversize headlamps gave the series 1 a startled look (not that the series 2’s were any better), the saloon’s rear door outline made it instantly recognisable as a car for the elderly and the blocky boot made the car look as if it were getting ever wider from front to back when nearly everybody else’s rear ends tapered down from wheelarch to bumper. The vast expanse of featureless painted metal between the rear lights and the fat chrome strip only helped to strengthen the impression of a fat rear end. The tack-on bootlid spoiler carrying the third brake light doesn’t exactly look like a quality item.
    It’s no wonder it got facelifted after a relatively short time.
    I’m still wondering what on Earth they’d smoked when they decided the OPC versions were the way to go.

    In their home country, Passat sales numbers were five times as high as the Vectra’s and Skoda sold twice as many Octavias.

    1. I tend not to want to listen to Bob Lutz.
      Leaving that aside, while I won´t argue the car is a stunner, I think you´re making a lot of what are subjective criticisms. I am on firmer ground regarding ingress and egress: design for the broader mainstream is always worth doing and right to do. The huge boot is a packaging issue; Opel probably based that on a researched fact, that customers wanted a massive boot. The follow-up car addressed that “blockiness” and got kicked for having a boot that was smaller than average. Opel could sell a pill to cure migraines and people would complain about the taste.

  2. I tend to find mass production cars far more interesting in design terms than exotic supercars. The former have to satisfy many more practical criteria, and be economic to produce as well. The Vectra C is a lovely, coherent piece of industrial design that has aged really well, IMHO:

    I really like the precise geometry and sheer surfaces. Its deceptively simple, but not at all dull. Unlike Richard, I prefer the five-door version as I find the C-pillar on the four-door slightly uncomfortable: specifically, the slightly frumpy “round shouldered” side DLO is somewhat at odds with the “fast” slope of the rear screen .

    The unusual headlamps on the original took some getting used to but, in hindsight, suit the car better than the rather heavy and “GM US corporate” facelift, which also lost the neat downward turn of the crease on the front wing to meet the bumper. Here it is for comparison:

    It’s a shame that GME cars have often been dismissed as automotive white goods. Some, like this Vectra, deserve better.

    1. Ditto, I have always loved this design in its original form, the purity of the forms, the wheel designs, the perfect proportions. I also do prefer the liftback.

    2. Agree with every single word by Daniel. Totally same thinking, and I prefer the pre-facelift fastback version as well.
      It is a complete design, leaving an authoritative, if slightly stern
      (fully suitable for an Opel) impression.

      Ever since the Astra F (and really, even since the last-gen Kadett) Opel has managed to roll-out cars that are mostly admirable in terms of sheer quality of design – with very few exceptions.

      Corsa B – aging incredibly well, and from nowadays perspective, has that ‘Etalonic’ quality of setting THE perfect size/packaging balance for a proper city car (Corsa B achieved the golden balance in this discipline, which becomes visible just today, where there’s almost zero *properly* sized/packaged true city cars).

      Tigra Mk1 – a masterpiece (if somewhat of a proverbial flop in terms
      of positioning and sociologic labelling).

      Astra F – no need to waste pen here.

      Astra G – a car whose styling (especially the 3-dr) defined the transition
      of ‘analogue modernity’ into ‘digital modernity’, exuding, even today,
      dignified reserves of time resistance on its beltline. It’s brimming with

      Astra H – somewhat dissappointing & overpretentious as a 5-dr, but the GTC and the Estate are true gems and I cannot pass them without my head turning.

      Meriva – apart from it being a somewhat messy engineered car – too heavy (hence deprived of dynamic joy) for what it’s sized like, simply as discipline of form it is another exercise where the influence of Kodama San shows almost from all angles.

      Omega last-gen.(facelift) – one of the most desirable sedans

      Signum – an acquired tate, but a definite brave step in answering
      a question very few asked. As opposed to another, well-selling
      “stretched WB limo” in disguise from a Czech/German brand, the Signum makes exemplary efforts to mask the comically long wheelbase with
      what’s one of the rare, longroof-but-not-Estate 5-dr.semi-exec cars.

      Vectra C – Daniel’s words above grasp the essential summary of what can be written on this understated, elegant and plenty time-resistant styling capsule.

      Zafira Mk1 – a bit lacking character, but still harmonious looking for
      an early MPV. Perhaps responsible for the relative success
      of this category of cars in the early 00’s.

      In my book, so many iconically styled models in only 3 decades is almost
      a Rekord of sorts (pun intended), and can only attest to a serious, unshakably founded styling culture that actually defined the
      undeniable appeal of what Opel as a brand stands for today.

      What the PSA future will bring is another topic altogether. The recent
      sad closure of Opel’s R&D centre will probably impact the traditionally
      stable aesthetic expectations from Opel, which are almost subconsciously embedded in each and every car guy/girl from our generation.

    3. Alex: thanks for that. Opel haven´t really got a lot of credit for their work. Partly, the whole business of their demerits as car for road testers gets in the way. And partly it´s because their designers remain quite anonymous. Christopher has named a few and they are names I am not familiar with whereas after many years of reading Car and Autocar I have a fair idea about BMW, Ford and Citroen´s design teams. Bangle, van Hoydonk, le Quement, Coco, Smith, Bird etc are all names we see bouncing about here. But Opel have been oddly reticent about their design and design philosophy which looks to me to have been very consistent over many decades. Wayne Cherry perhaps? Other branches of GM have had more publicly ackoweldge designers. Why not Opel?
      I too am concerned PSA will disrupt the continuity at Opel. Is the design centre really closing?

    4. Al: I´d like to return to the Meriva. Both iterations had something going for them and I´d hate to have to choose between them. The first one´s a really rigorous bit of design work yet isn´t unfriendly. The only thing “wrong” with it is what is not there: they did not, to my knowledge, do a warm/soft interior. This was probably because the price point was on the low side. The other thing is colour: the only colour I seem to see is pale metallic grey. It´s not really Opel´s fault nobody wanted it in mid-green or orange or burgundy with a dark blue interior. The geometry isn´t boring but the colours sold certainly were.

  3. Here’s the four-door. Actually, the C-pillar isn’t bad, just unusual:

    Don’t forget the Signum (almost everyone has), the Vectra’s intriguing but unloved sibling:

    Masses of space, but never understood or appreciated.

    1. A neighbour has a Signum, so I see it almost every day. I still don’t understand it.

      All that rear cabin space, but an austere cabin and a hard ride. Your passengers have leg room to spare but will still be uncomfortable. What is the point?

      Also, my neighbour has the six cylinder diesel, and it is a belching health hazard, which hardly endears the car to me.

      In the UK, the Vectra was let down by Vauxhall’s typically awful marketing. There was a time when the Cavalier seemed to encompass the hopes and aspirations of the hard-working, ambitious executive, while Corsas were seen as appealing and youthful and Astras provided faithful service to the family. Then it all fell to pieces.

    2. Hi Jacomo. I should have made clear that I was commenting purely on the aesthetic qualities of the Vectra and Signum. I was aware that they were nothing special dynamically and the cabin fittings were supplied by Poundworld.

      Regarding the Signum, although it sold poorly, Fiat apparently decided the concept was viable, hence the 2005 Croma:

      They were wrong…

    3. If only Fiat had given the Croma a raised ride height, grey wheelarch and bodyside cladding, massive wheels and a more aggressive snout. A surefire hit!

  4. I did like Richard’s migraine pill anecdote; apt for such a company. Opel / Vauxhall really do seem to have that lingering feeling of being ok but not quite fully there. It’s odd as these are humble, hard working horses that don’t shout about it. There are a handful still knocking around near me but I cant say I give them a second glance. After this post, that will change.

  5. The early 2000s was a great era for car design and i remember going from being a opel hater to a fan with the new design language.
    Zafira, Meriva, Vectra, Astra, Speedster and the vivaro – all felt like a breath of fresh air to a young lad with a fresh drivers license, and something truly new compared to the cars of the previous decade.
    i still like them all, despite not being perfect by any means.

    To bad the quality was less then stellar, turning a lot of potential return customers away from the brand forever.

    My father exchanged his trusty old 1994 hiace hiclass for a first year opel vivaro and let me just say everything that could possibly break broke – even the gear change cable snapped after only two years.
    He traded it in for a new hiace after 3 years, which felt pretty agricultural compared to smooth opel, but after experiencing the horrors of the vivaro, the solid and agricultural feel was a positive thing and not drawback.

  6. Richard, the Vectra C was developed under chief designer, Hans Seer. Smith’s appointment to the post was in 2002, and all the cars unveiled after that date were (right- or wrongfully) credited to him – not to mention marketed as a deliberate break from the austere form language of much of the Seer-era.

    1. Thanks – the name Hans Seer is new to me and it is a bit of a pity because it seems he was a careful and thorough designer. Martin Smith did not spend much time at Opel, did he? In 2004 he was at Ford. He must have spent a fortune on removals.

    2. Smith wasn’t poached from Audi in 2002, but had joined Opel in 1997 already. So he would’ve been involved in the creation of many of the cars he was later supposed to make the customer forget about.

      Hans Seer should be your kind of car designer, incidentally.

  7. Thanks for this, Richard! It’s one of my early 2000s’ favourites – especially seen in the light of what Citroën did in this segment at the time.

    Like Daniel, I’m not a fan of the conservative looking saloon with its strange rounded rear doors. For me, the much more elegant (and useful) hatchback is way better looking. The blockiness that was criticised isn’t too bad in my eyes. It gave the car an air of solidity that a contemporary Astra (the one that was launched around 1998) didn’t have – it always seemed insubstantial and brittle to me.

    What I liked about the concept was the longer wheelbase for the estate – this version has an even better design than the shorter variants. The way the DLO and the rear bumper / light shutline form a mirror image of each other is quite clever:

    The idea to use the estate wheelbase for an upmarket passenger version (Signum) is also quite appealing (Citroën CX Prestige, anyone?). That the suspension and interior apparently didn’t live up to this ambition is a real pity. I think it has a really nice stance (but I’m a sucker for long wheelbases, so I have to like it). The Croma shown above suffers very much from its diminutive underpinnings in comparison.

    1. Hi Simon. Ironically, the Astra G had a reputation for being really tough and able to cope with neglect, a reputation that was tested rigorously tested by a neighbour of ours who drove one for years and a great mileage without ever getting it serviced. When it finally expired, she replaced it with an old Rover 200 with the K-series engine. You already know what happened next…

  8. Simon, your observation about the Vectra Estate is very sharp. If you try to cover the taillight on this photo, it’s plain to see that the rest of the car’s profile is so minimalistic, that they simply had to thing of something
    to make the form possible to memorize.

    If it wasn’t for that clever (and sharp, so sharp!) “joint” between the DLO’s edge and the taillight, it would be just bland to the point of oblivion.

    This can pass as a “phenomenologic reduction”, and, although seemingly just a trick, it can be valued highly as a design methodology.

  9. Hi Alex, you raise the intriguing question of where Opel design goes next under PSA. Coincidentally, this teaser image on the next Corsa was released today:

    Not sure about the fussy headlamp graphic, but the surrounding bodywork looks crisp and, dare I say it, rather (old-school) Teutonic.

  10. Not me, I’m afraid to say, but I do note that your piece on a decidedly mainstream and unexotic car has solicited 21 comments. So, despite your fears, at least some pulses were raised.

    Good old DTW (and its readership, of course!)

  11. Daniel, the outline and general shape of that next-gen Corsa headlight,
    on first sight, seem to recall the general shape of LdVA’s Clio IV headlights.

    The outer edge of the unit, as well (in the way it defines the curvature
    of the front wings), with that sharp ironed crease in the wing,
    somehow reminds me of previous-gen Meganes/Scenics.
    (the wing convexity radius seems spot on with the Megane III).

    I wouldn’t be surprised, given the way the Clio IV and Citroen C3 kind
    of dominate the sales charts for non-SUV B-segm vehicles
    (which are, truly speaking, C++ -segm. -sized), that the rest (eg. Opel)
    shall try to extract the essential tricks from those two mega-succesful cars.

    Speaking of the C3, I recently had the chance to visit one in a showroom
    and had a very long (had to wait for someone hence had the time to)
    look around and inside it:

    Not hard to see why it’s so succesful – it carries a huge, Golf VI bulk
    of physical presence, which is cleverly disguised in a cute,
    teddy-bear-esque kind of shape opulence.

    Its ‘stance’ is decidedly SUV-like, which, again, comes masked with its sheer size and body-height: the actual, measured ride-height,
    and general height (seating surface height, most notably) is almost
    on Dacia levels. I underline this, as today’s species of Homo Appiens
    do not like exercising their backbone during in-/egress, in an early-Civic
    or 3-series kind of movements…).

    What puzzles me, and left me thinking that I’d probably never choose a C3 myself, is the enormously small trunk capacity compared to what its objective, gargantuan size could promise (even in the most pessimistic scenario). Just where that bulk of a rear-end “went”, and how the boot
    is so small, is totally beyond me. If I sacrifice ‘squeezability’, by choosing to live daily with a huge car that pretends to be a “small family car”
    (trust me on this one, I lived 7 years with a Logan as predominant daily),
    it better have a cavernous trunk to compensate for those stressful, awkward, narrow-street daily situations.

    The Logan (and admittedly, the Sandero to an extent, too) were rather generous in remunerating the owner for the size issues, in trunk capacity currency, cash on hand.

    The C3 is appaling in this regard.

    Its other virtues are, however, very tempting, and it’s hardly a wonder why it sells like hot donuts on a chilly day. Many have been cheated by its size, yet they’ll probably be happy campers, most of the days.

    But the C3 is another story.

  12. Richard,

    I fully share your thoughts both on the “carpentry” feeling Meriva interior, and the street-test of its most chosen colours
    showing so transparently the psychologic profile of the avg., statistically dominant Meriva buyer.

    It’s enough to say that, at one stage, I had an idea to track down
    a brightly coloured 1st owner Meriva, replace the front seats with something comfier, and perform a general reupholstery of the interior with some vivid, patterned fabric that would enhance
    the ambiance immeasurably. Plus a set of 16″ AZEV As or ATS wheels.

    Its very dissappointing “physical density” figures, however, talked me out of owning one and doing it – it’s somehow
    a pointless car if you like your cars feeling light
    and eager, as I do.

    As for the Opel designers, I believe it’s part of (a very wise!)
    GM culture to traditionally link the power of its styling with
    the brand(s) itself/themselves, and not ‘dilute’ the effects with accenting individual designers’ merits for a certain shape.

    Yes, it misses the panache of having posh, ‘haute-couture’ associations of a genuinely designed product by a famous name,
    but it probably pays much bigger brand-loyalty dividends decades later.

    Personally, I find Hideo Kodama’s influence crucial to the overall 90’s and 00’s direction of Opel’s visual identity. He achieved the seemingly impossible balance of avchieving a car that had
    a recognisable purity and functionality of an Opel, yet with
    ‘facial features’ and derrieres that were almost revolutionary
    (for an Opel) anthropomorphic, even cute, in some
    cases. The cuteness was, earlier, in the 70’s & 80’s,
    considered a major brand sin for an Opel, and noone even considered thinking about doing such a car.

    The Astra F, but particularly his Corsa B and Tigra, were
    the turning point in this new Opel image, in my opinion.

    Apart from the genius of Bruno Sacco, it is very hard to recall
    of another single designer that hadn’t a proper Carte Blanche (i.e., who managed to compromise his creativity so much, so as to satisfy the corporate/brand straight-lacedness requirements), and yet design – and persevere keeping the original design passable thru all pre-production stages – truly likeable
    and aesthetically uncompromised cars.

    Whether he’s still somehow involved, and to what extent,
    I really don’t have a clue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: