Social Acceptance

Ten years old this year, we mark the debut of the phat-rumped Panamera and ask, what does the advent of the Taycan EV mean for the Porsche sedan?

Does my bum look big in this? No, but does it…?  2015 Porsche Panamera GTS: (c) Porsche

Following one of the most protracted and anti-climactic stripteases in automotive history, Porsche revealed their first ever series-production four-door saloon in 2009. Not the first four-door saloon to be produced by Porsche, mark you; Zuffenhausen having built the (W124-series) 500E for Mercedes-Benz, but certainly the first to bear the proud crest of Stuttgart upon its nose.

The 2009 Panamera was a product of a perceived necessity within the Baden-Württemberg carmaker to diversify to a broader offer as buffer against the ever-shifting fortunes of sports car manufacture, but also viewed by then CEO, the ambitious Wendelin Wiedeking as a means of further strengthening the company’s profitability – then considered the envy of the industry.

Strictly speaking however, the 2003 Cayenne SUV was doing a more than capable job on both fronts, but of course, nobody was sure whether this highly controversial model line would prove a success, and having made several stabs at a luxury saloon in the past, it seemed a logical step to make, especially when a good deal of componentry between both car lines could be shared.

Schemed during the period when Wiedeking was hatching his audacious plan to gain control of the mighty Wolfsburg carmaking collossus, by the time the Panam’ was readied in 2009, not only had the world economy collapsed, but Wiedeking had rather ignominiously and decisively run out of road.

Having already given marque enthusiasts an attack of the screaming vapours with the design for the Cayenne, Porsche stylists, in conjunction with senior management seemed in no mood to loosen the thumbscrews when it came to the Panamera’s style – a rather heavy handed affair which lacked grace or much in the way of flair.

Commonly attributed to current design chief, Michael Mauer, its styling most likely predated his appointment, so even if he did oversee the production design, he’s unlikely to have influenced a single line on the car. Who designed the Panamera then? Alongside Jaguar’s hapless X200 S-Type, the credit goes, in film-making parlance, to Alan Smithee.

Fortunately for Porsche, not only was financial catastrophe averted in the 2009 meltdown – albeit at the cost of being assimilated by the automotive titan they had attempted to control – but the Panamera proved a commercial success, despite there being a strong feeling amongst elements within the Wolfsburg corridors of power that it was a mis-step.

Staggeringly, a VW representative (who we must assume was subsequently taken outside and shot) told The Automobile in October 2009, “These vehicles [Cayenne and Panamera] are too big, too heavy, too thirsty. They damage the brands, send out the wrong message, and are no longer socially acceptable. They will have to bite the dust after the next generation“. Clearly, a change of heart, brought about by the financial crash and the profits both models brought in, salved consciences along the banks of the Mittelandkanal.

But a decade is a very long time in the motor business, and so here we are at Frankfurt 2019, (well some of us are) marking the debut of another ground-breaking Porsche model – its first ever electric vehicle. Not the first electric powered car to bear the Porsche name mark you; Ferdinand himself developing the front-driven Lohner-Porsche Mixte hybrid in 1900, but the first in-house Zuffenhausen EV, based on the acclaimed 2014 Mission E concept.

Enough words have been spilled on the Taycan’s positioning, alleged rivalry and technical specification to rehash it all again here, so instead, we offer the observations of Auto-Didakt’s Christopher Butt, who at least had the benefit of a three-dimensional encounter with Zuffenhausen’s new standard bearer.

While to this author’s eyes the Taycan can appear a little tame – at least when compared with the more dramatic 2014 Mission E, our correspondent was somewhat more impressed.

Stylistically, Taycan is the first truly convincing Porsche saloon; it’s the first time 911-like proportions have been achieved on a four-door body, owing to its unusual architecture. Mauer and team employed that freedom to great effect, yet it doesn’t feel just like a long ‘elfer – the integrated rear spoiler et al lend it sufficient character of its own.

Thankfully, Porsche decided against the visual cyphers currently employed by the German ‘premiums’ for their EV models. Hence no cheap shiny plastic – Porsche’s designers seemingly understanding that a car’s aesthetics are quite different from those of a mobile phone. Instead, the four separate headlights, pronounced air vents and intricate wheel designs suggest that this isn’t merely a smaller Panamera.

In terms of perceived quality, it’s up to very high standard. There’s none of the feeling of something having to give in order to pay for that expensive EV platform – as it should be, given its pricing. The interior however is very touchscreen-heavy, which is the only let-down. They couldn’t buck all trends, it seems.

Of course the unspoken question is where this leaves the Panamera, now in its second generation and still holding its own saleswise? The answer to this is probably best expressed as a question. It really depends on how successful the Taycan proves to be and how much of Porsche’s customer-base are prepared to abandon combustion propulsion in favour of electric power.

Panam’ version 2.0 (c) jalopnik

For now therefore, it appears that Porsche, like most other mainstream OEM carmakers will continue to hedge their bets; the Panamera most likely moving to an entirely hybrid-powered offer aimed at those markets which lack a comprehensive charging infrastructure – which at the present time still amounts to quite a few.

It’s an expensive way of operating, (and for now Porsche can probably afford to do so) but an expedient one for deeply uncertain times. But regardless of one’s position on the subject, only one of these cars is the socially acceptable choice. Which it is to be however, the customer will ultimately decide.

Author: Eóin Doyle

Founding Editor. Content Provider.

5 thoughts on “Social Acceptance”

  1. I like the Taycan a lot, apart from the squarish headlamps with their “tattooed teardrops” below, which I’m really not sure about on a Porsche:

    Porsche has had headlamp trouble before, when they strayed away from clean, rounded shapes. Remember the “fried egg” items on the 986/998 generation Boxster and 911.

    Perhaps the Taycan’s headlamps might look better on a Toyota:

  2. The Taycan has a very similar footprint to the Panamera. In terms of accommodation, it comes with an additional luggage compartment up front but compromised headroom in the rear cabin (a four door car that cannot accommodate adults comfortably in the back seats is a bit of a design failure).

    The Taycan is, of course, even heavier than the Panamera.

    The Panamera is now a good looking car, in my view, but it is too large for European roads. In America and other world markets it would work rather better. If only it had been a little smaller and 2-300kg lighter.

  3. I’m struggling to believe the Panemera is ten years old…I’d have said six at most.
    As for the Toucan, Paycan, whatever it’s called, the blue version at the show looks very nice. Daniels white version above does not with those un-endearing headlamps; they appear to blend better into the blue. The white has a look of an out of work and depressed clown.
    The Pamemera always made me look twice when seen which isn’t often but for reasons I struggle with. It has the badge, the elongated looks but no warmth. Though I don’t believe any Porsche has, being coldly efficient. What I am certain of is that the Taycan will be hyper wonderful to drive once there’s enough juice in it, sad face aside

  4. The communis opinio seems to be that the first Panamera wasn’t good looking, the new one is better and the Taycan is better still. I can only agree, even though I understand the reservation about the headlights. I think in real life it might look different as almost all the photos of the front I’ve seen are taking from a low perspective, while the car only is 1,381 millimeters tall.

    In fact all outer dimensions are within a 100 millimeters difference of the current Mondeo. Since last Sunday’s article I’m paying more attention to Mondeos. I saw a white one today sitting in a parking lot and it looked very bloated. Can’t say the same about the Porsche. The Taycan is even wider than a Panamera, which as mentioned before can be a bit frustrating in some situations in Europe. That said I see more Panameras than Mondeos here…

  5. in my youth in the 60s in Melbourne, the drive to Sydney
    often beckoned, possessing a mystique of sorts, 550 miles
    of two-lane blacktop (then) from the restraints of our city to that
    fabulous harbour town. I first achieved it in my 1960 Fiat 500
    at a time when an E-Type seemed the most desirable possibility.
    over the years other ideals have offered themselves, but the original
    Panemera was the first car in ages to make me think again of that journey.
    I’ve only seen a few in the metal and like their rounded dumpiness very much,
    a fit-for-purpose (my imagined purpose) that seems just right, and makes
    them the most interesting thing Porsche have done in recent times.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.