En Garde! Part One

Taking influence to unprecedented heights.

Image: GM/ Jalopyjournal

Like the Buick Y-job that went before it, the 1951 LeSabre concept car was a GM testbed for both technology and stylistic ideas. The low-slung roadster, bodied in aluminium and magnesium, was the first to have the panoramic windshield that would be a defining feature on virtually all American cars from the mid- to late fifties. Its overall look is best described as jet age on wheels.

LeSabre also used the first application of GM’s 215 cubic inch (3.5 litre) aluminium V8 which would later find its way into a variety of cars, both in the USA and Europe – although in the LeSabre’s case the engine was supercharged and capable of running on both regular fuel and methanol. Harley Earl was known to use the car regularly on his commute for many years, covering no less than 45,000 miles in the process.

Concept cars were and are used to gauge the public’s response to new styling and engineering ideas, and in many cases certain styling aspects are incorporated (although most often in severely diluted form) into production vehicles. The looks of the LeSabre however made such an impact on the public that it spawned a number of not always flattering copies in tribute to its styling, to an extent never seen before or since; the stern of the LeSabre in particular seemingly being especially popular to emulate.

A substantial percentage of these were the work of German coachbuilder Spohn; based in Ravensburg, who had produced some unique, futuristic bodies for Maybach (Zeppelin), Bugatti and Mercedes-Benz prior to the second world war. After the war the erstwhile prestigious company was in dire financial straits and therefore jumped at the chance of work to keep the Deutschmarks and Dollars flowing.

In the early to mid-fifties a number of American GI’s stationed in West Germany and making good money in the process approached Spohn to restyle their cars – in some cases already a decade old – in the image of the LeSabre that had made such an impression on them. It is indicative of how desperate for cash this venerable coachbuilder now was that it did not perceive it as beneath its dignity to blatantly copy styling elements from another company.

Others handy with metalworking, cutting and welding decided to take the job on themselves. Internally at GM during the latter period of Harley Earl’s leadership of the styling studio, serious plans were considered to put the LeSabre’s face on the 1959 Buick production model. Even behind the iron curtain, the LeSabre had not gone unnoticed, nor as we shall see, could a bus builder resist temptation.

Major Jack T. Chandler of the U.S. Air Force and stationed in occupied West Germany approached Spohn to modify his 1941 Ford to his own specification – the rear being a straight copy of the LeSabre’s, and the front along the lines of another Buick concept car, the XP-300. In late 1952 the car was delivered to Major Chandler.

A report on the car in the magazine Speed Age noted that all body parts were hand-formed and that the fit and finish were remarkably smooth; at least it appears that impoverished as they may have been, Spohn still delivered quality work. Another Ford-based Spohn product, in this case a 1940 model, was also completed in 1952 and delivered to an unknown owner. Named Palos, it has survived to this day.

Another U.S. Airforce officer, Major Ralph W. Angel, had brought a car of a more recent vintage to the Spohn coachworks: a 1950 Chevrolet. Again the rear styling is heavily inspired by the LeSabre, but the frontal styling recalls a concept car of a competitor – the 1953 Ford X-100. The car had a removable padded top and the interior was fully upholstered in leather, with a radio built in the front seat dividing armrest. Spohn’s bill amounted to US $4,500; upon his return to the USA Mr. Angel took the car with him but decided to sell it because it attracted too much attention.

A 1952 Pontiac was the base for another LeSabre-isation by Spohn on an almost new car. Originally commissioned by a U.S. Colonel, the stern received the by now familiar treatment although the front styling was quite unlike the LeSabre. Interestingly, likely due to the virtual unavailability of stainless steel and the high cost of chrome in postwar Germany, the brightwork on this car consisted of highly polished aluminium.

Arthur Cooper 1941 Packard by Spohn. Image: Fabwheelsdigest

The last Spohn creation presented here -and these are by no means all of them – is U.S. Army lieutenant Arthur Cooper’s 1941 Packard. Christened the Cooper Comet, the car had a novel sliding glass roof over the front seat. At the front, the styling bears no relation to GM’s 1951 showstopper but at the rear it is pure LeSabre once again. Painted light grey metallic and with a build cost of around US $7,000, the Cooper Comet last surfaced in 1974 but its current whereabouts are unknown.

The concluding part will follow shortly.

Author: brrrruno

Car brochure collector, Thai food lover, not a morning person before my first cup of coffee

13 thoughts on “En Garde! Part One”

  1. Thanks for this post brrrruno. I’ve known the 1951 LeSabre for a long time and heard of Spohn too, (the 1950 BMW Veritas SP90 Spohn Roadster comes to mind, see photo below) but never knew they were connected. Looking forward to part two.

    1. It would appear that Spohn modified several existing Veritas roadsters after they had begun “customising” cars for American G.I.s.

    2. I’m a sucker for cars “suffering” weathering…

      This, along with your article, Bruno is delightful. How these creatures must’ve massaged their owners egos, attracted attention and I’d wager caused a few fisticuffs over their looks – that of car or maybe passenger. I couldn’t give them driveway room but can fully appreciate their owners reasons why they had them built.

      Do you need to warn readers of anything as out-there for part two? Can’t wait!

  2. Good afternoon Bruno. Whatever one thinks of the tastefulness or otherwise of these creations, one has to admire the skill and resourcefulness of Spohn and his colleagues in tapping into a customer base that had more disposable income than many in post-war West Germany.

    Here’s a colour photo of the 1951 Le Sabre concept:

    Looking forward to more weird and wonderful examples in Part Two!

  3. I had almost forgotten of these visual sins. Are all cars pictured spohn, or is the picture in the top right of the collage the Salmson by Esclassen?

    1. Hello Andrew,
      No it is not-it is one of the several LeSabre-ised cars done by Spohn; but the Salmson will make an appearance in the second installment!

    1. I loved the “hot rod” reversed port nailheads, where the supercharger blew through the side ports and the exhaust exited at the middle of the ‘V’.

  4. Hello Fred and Roberto,
    Thank you for the links with the information; the available sources pointed to the 1951 LeSabre V8 being the original ancestor to the widely used V8, but one of those sources is WikiPedia which I am aware is not always to be fully trusted.
    In another source (https://ateupwithmotor.com/model-histories/buick-special-skylark-rover-v8-3800-v6-history/) the story is slightly ambivalent; according to this last one Charles A. Chayne ordered the development of an experimental high-performance aluminum V8 for the LeSabre and XP-300 concept cars. That engine was designed by Joseph Turlay and it was not designed with volume series production in mind. However, already one year after the LeSabre broke cover Chayne ordered the development of an aluminium V8 engine which was meant to be used in production cars- the well known 215. No word if the 1951 LeSabre engine was used as a starting point or if this was a clean slate new design.

    Myself not being an expert on engines, the fact that they share the same displacement and material made me assume they are at the very least strongly related. But your info does suggest this may not be the fact.

    1. Well, the bore and stroke are entirely different, the heads are different, the valve gear is different, the XP300 pistons are different nd have domes instead of being flat-topped, and run in wet iron liners instead of cast in ones as on the production engine, oh and the XP300 engine has a Roots supercharger — other than that the XP engine and the later production engine are the same! As in — alloy V8. That is also a description of the Cosworth DFV F1 engine.

      You don’t have to know much about engines to realize the two engines are completely different, and no dithering about whether it is or not is warranted.

  5. Interesting how we’ve gone from having (false) ‘Batmobile’-type exhausts to hiding them completely, these days.

    It looks like a number of these cars’ exhausts exited through the rear bumper – if that’s the case, then polished aluminum would have been preferable to chromed steel, as Vauxhall found out in the 1950s.

    Of the early concept cars, I think I prefer the Buick Y; I might have a thing about hidden headlights, as I love 1940s De Sotos and Mercury Cougars, too.

    Very interesting, and I’m looking forward to the next part.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.